Best Moment Ever!!

Raymond's News~~

too many thing happen during this long holiday..

it all start with a super duper bad thing with the lost of my loves, my babes..

it is~ was to be exact.. my 2 phones and laptop...

to make thing worse.. 

the stupid thieves aka drug addicts also took along my backup pendrive which contained my thesis backup copy...

if i can kill anyone in this world without need to hang my neck to a rope im sure i ll kill all drug addicts and thieves.. 

thieves shudnt be punished by keep in jail but shud be serve with death penalty..watever ways ie electric chair, hang, poison, shoot on head, etc..... but my favorite is torture by me in various ways til death!!haha..

now.. raymond need to restart his thesis from zero.. anyone willing to help him just drop a msg here or contact him.. he is more than happy to receive the msg.. beside thesis, anyone who willing to sponsor a new laptop or phone are welcome as well.. :)

一篇很值得分享的故事

this is a story about single parent child.. really touching..

我的妻子因為意外事故離開我身邊已經四年了，我想，妻子留下不會做任何家事的我和孩子，她的心有何等難過呢？我也因為無法兼顧父母雙親的角色而感到挫折。有一天我為了出差，清晨趕出門，無法將孩子打點好就得離開家，正巧前一天有剩下的飯，我熱了蒸蛋，向還沒有睡醒的孩子交代一聲，就出門去了。

為了照顧好孩子飲食三餐的事，我也無力把自己的工作做好。有一天晚上回到家，我只是很簡短地和孩子打個招呼，就因為身體疲累，不想吃晚餐，脫掉西裝之後就直接往床上躺下。就在那個時候，砰的一聲，紅色的湯汁跟泡麵瞬時弄髒了床單和被單，原來有碗泡麵在棉被裡！這小子真是的，說時遲那時快，我即時拿起一個衣架，跑出去，往正玩著玩具的兒子的屁股就打，因為我實在是太生氣了，所以不停地打他。但就在這個時候，他邊啜泣邊說了一段話，使我停了下來。兒子告訴我說：「飯鍋裡的飯早上已經吃完了，晚餐在幼稚園吃了，但是到了晚上，爸爸還不回來，我就在櫥櫃的抽屜裡找到了泡麵。可是我想到爸爸說不能亂動瓦斯爐， 所以我就打開洗澡的水龍頭，用熱水泡了泡麵，一個自己吃，另一個想留給爸爸吃。因為怕泡麵涼掉，所以我就把它放在棉被裡，等你回來。可是因為我正在玩向朋友借來的玩具，所以忘了跟爸爸講。」

我不想讓兒子看到我在流淚，所以衝到洗手間，將水龍頭打開，大聲地哭。過了一陣子之後，我打起精神來，一面哄著兒子，一面也在他屁股上擦藥，讓他上床睡覺。當我清理好泡麵弄髒的床單和棉被後，打開兒子的房門一看，發現他仍舊發出哭泣聲，手裡還拿著媽媽的照片。我把頭靠在房門站了許久，看著這一幕。

自從在一年前發生這件事之後，我為了扮演好媽媽的角色，更加用心地去照顧他。現在兒子快七歲了，不久後就要從幼稚園畢業，進入國小讀書。慶幸的是，兒子在這段時間毫無陰影，很開朗地成長。就在不久前，我再一次打孩子，因為幼稚園來電話說，兒子沒有去學校，我心裡覺得很不安，所以早退回家，在整個社區裡大聲地喊他的名字，卻是遍尋不著。後來在文具店的門口，看見他站在電玩的前面，於是我很生氣，又開始一直打他。兒子並沒有說出任何的解釋，只說了聲對不起。後來我才知道，原來剛好是幼稚園要邀請媽媽去看才藝表演的日子。

發生這些事的幾天後，兒子回家說，他在幼稚園裡學了寫字，從此他經常關在自己的房間裡不出來，很認真地寫字。我看到兒子這個樣子，想到妻子在天國也一定會因為看到他這樣而微笑，我就無法忍住淚水。時間很快，又過了一年，到了冬天，街頭上都在播放著聖誕節的歌曲，我的兒子卻又闖了一個禍。我正要下班的時候，接到一通社區郵局的電話，說我兒子把一綑沒有寫地址的信，惡作劇地放在郵筒裡。每年到了年底，正是郵局最忙碌的時候，所以這對他們造成很大的困擾。雖然我已決定不再打孩子，但在急忙趕回家後，叫了兒子來，我又忍不住痛打他一頓。兒子這一次只是說他做錯了，卻沒有講出任何理由。我把他推到一個角落，不管了，自個兒跑到郵局領回那一綑惡作劇的信。我把信丟到他眼前說：「你為什麼要這樣惡作劇？」兒子哭著回答說
：「這些信是我要寄給媽媽的。」

當時我的眼眶紅了起來，心裡很激動，但是因為在兒子面前，所以我盡量隱忍住沒有表現出來。我接著問他：「那麼，為什麼一次寄這麼多信呢？」兒子回答說：「以前我要把信投進去的時候，因為個兒太矮，所以沒辦法投入，但是最近我再去郵筒時，已經搆得到了，所以我就把以前沒有寄的，一次全部都投進入了。」我聽了以後，心中一片茫然，不知道該對孩子說什麼話。過了不久以後，我就跟他說：「媽媽現在在天上，以後你寫完信，把信燒了，就能送到天國去。」等孩子睡著之後，我到外面燒了那些信。我很好奇到底孩子想跟媽媽說些什麼，所以讀了其中的幾封信。而當中有一封信攪動了我的心。

「親愛的媽媽：

我很想念你！媽媽，今天在幼稚園有才藝表演，但是因 為我沒有媽媽，所以沒有去參加，我也沒有告訴爸爸，怕爸爸會想念媽媽。爸爸到處去找我，但我為了讓爸爸 看到我很開心的樣子，所以故意坐在電動玩具面前，雖然爸爸罵我，但是我到最後也沒有告訴他原因。媽媽，我每天都看到爸爸因為想念媽媽而哭泣，我想爸爸也跟我一樣，很想念媽媽吧！但是，媽，我現在已經記不清楚你的臉。媽媽，請你讓我在夢中，再一次能夠看到你的臉，好嗎？聽說把想念的人的照片放在懷裡睡覺，就會夢到那個人。可是，媽媽，為什麼你沒有出現在我的夢裡呢？」

讀完這封信以後，我就開始嚎啕大哭。到底什麼時候， 我才能填補妻子的空位呢？

Interesting Article

Just discovered this article in a friend blog and copy it to share with you all..

Although this was written 2years back, but still, u can feel that it happen around us everyday..

Is that mean that Malaysia Govt still the same back then??

They never improve??

WTF.. with the all money wasted, Malaysian get nothing..

Only those special treated human being get it all!! wtf..

People money should goes to people..

In this 2 years the changes is there..with the political tsunami on 308..

However for the past 8 months i could not sense any changes promised by both govt n opposition

What they do in the parliament??

Fight like cat n dog, like immature children, like adult playground!

Izzit after a person grown up/old it is bad to fight at outside world therefore u fight to become
MP to fight in Parliament??!wtf...

Is is so call the Noble Battle?? Battle in the most nobel place in our country..

And the opposition..what the hell are you doing??

Don't like the person speaking.. let's go out! Is that a MP attitute??

showing u unsatisfactory by walking away?? Such a Coward!!

FUCK OFF Malaysia useless MP.. NO MATTER U R FROM GOVT OR OPPOSITION PARTY!!

While Malaysia fiddles, its opportunities are running dry
Michael Backman
November 15, 2006

MALAYSIA'S been at it again, arguing about what proportion of the economy each of its two main races — the Malays and the Chinese — owns. It's an argument that's been running for 40 years. That wealth and race are not synonymous is important for national cohesion, but really it's time Malaysia grew up.

It's a tough world out there and there can be little sympathy for a country that prefers to argue about how to divide wealth rather than get on with the job of creating it.

The long-held aim is for 30 per cent of corporate equity to be in Malay hands, but the figure that the Government uses to justify handing over huge swathes of public companies to Malays but not to other races is absurd. It bases its figure on equity valued, not at market value, but at par value.

Many shares have a par value of say $1 but a market value of $12. And so the Government figure (18.9 per cent is the most recent figure) is a gross underestimate. Last month a paper by a researcher at a local think-tank came up with a figure of 45 per cent based on actual stock prices. All hell broke loose. The paper was withdrawn and the researcher resigned in protest. Part of the problem is that he is Chinese.

"Malaysia boleh!" is Malaysia's national catch cry. It translates to "Malaysia can!" and Malaysia certainly can. Few countries are as good at wasting money. It is richly endowed with natural resources and the national obsession seems to be to extract these, sell them off and then collectively spray the proceeds up against the wall.

This all happens in the context of Malaysia's grossly inflated sense of its place in the world.

Most Malaysians are convinced that the eyes of the world are on their country and that their leaders are world figures. This is thanks to Malaysia's tame media and the bravado of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. The truth is, few people on the streets of London or New York could point to Malaysia on a map much less name its prime minister or capital city.

As if to make this point, a recent episode of The Simpsons features a newsreader trying to announce that a tidal wave had hit some place called Kuala Lumpur. He couldn't pronounce the city's name and so made up one, as if no-one cared anyway. But the joke was on the script writers — Kuala Lumpur is inland.

Petronas, the national oil company is well run, particularly when compared to the disaster that passes for a national oil company in neighbouring Indonesia. But in some respects, this is Malaysia's problem. The very success of Petronas means that it is used to underwrite all manner of excess.

The KLCC development in central Kuala Lumpur is an example. It includes the Twin Towers, the tallest buildings in the world when they were built, which was their point.

It certainly wasn't that there was an office shortage in Kuala Lumpur — there wasn't.

Malaysians are very proud of these towers. Goodness knows why. They had little to do with them. The money for them came out of the ground and the engineering was contracted out to South Korean companies.

They don't even run the shopping centre that's beneath them. That's handled by Australia's Westfield.

Next year, a Malaysian astronaut will go into space aboard a Russian rocket — the first Malay in space. And the cost? $RM95 million ($A34.3 million), to be footed by Malaysian taxpayers. The Science and Technology Minister has said that a moon landing in 2020 is the next target, aboard a US flight. There's no indication of what the Americans will charge for this, assuming there's even a chance that they will consider it. But what is Malaysia getting by using the space programs of others as a taxi service? There are no obvious technical benefits, but no doubt Malaysians will be told once again, that they are "boleh". The trouble is, they're not. It's not their space program.

Back in July, the Government announced that it would spend $RM490 million on a sports complex near the London Olympics site so that Malaysian athletes can train there and "get used to cold weather".

But the summer Olympics are held in the summer.

So what is the complex's real purpose? The dozens of goodwill missions by ministers and bureaucrats to London to check on the centre's construction and then on the athletes while they train might provide a clue.

Bank bale outs, a formula one racing track, an entire new capital city — Petronas has paid for them all. It's been an orgy of nonsense that Malaysia can ill afford.
Why? Because Malaysia's oil will run out in about 19 years. As it is, Malaysia will become a net oil importer in 2011 — that's just five years away.

So it's in this context that the latest debate about race and wealth is so sad.
It is time to move on, time to prepare the economy for life after oil. But, like Nero fiddling while Rome burned, the Malaysian Government is more interested in stunts like sending a Malaysian into space when Malaysia's inadequate schools could have done with the cash, and arguing about wealth distribution using transparently ridiculous statistics.

That's not Malaysia "boleh", that's Malaysia "bodoh" (stupid).


Couldn't agree more with some of the facts conveyed.

A Treat to Cake Lovers!!!

To all Secret Recipe Lovers out there..
I know it s an uncountable numbers of who cant live without cake..
Read this post carefully.. this is for you !!

Secret Recipe- BUY one Free one!!!
Secret Recipe蛋糕买一送一!!!


TERMS & CONDITIONS
1. Promotion starts from 11.00 am and valid while stocks last for the day.
2. Buy 1 Free 1 applicable to cakes available in promo selection only.
3. No pre-order, pre-payment or phone orders will be accepted for the promotion.
4. Promotion is limited to ONE CAKE PURCHASE / TRANSACTION per customer in queue only.
5. Not applicable with any other card privileges / promotions / discounts.
6. Customer MUST QUEUE to be entitled for the promotion.
7. There will also be an option available for a FREE Whole Cake Voucher in replacement of the FREE Whole Cake.


So, 11/11/2008 11am.. make sure remember to get 2 Cakes with the price of one!!
whoever cant finish the cake can send it to me.. im willing to help you to settle it!!
有兴趣的记得11号去排队吧

Wish List

For those who plan to give me a gift.. for what ever reason..
even without any reason.. here is my wish list.....

I wanna a Digital SLR Camera...


A Digital SLR Nikon D40x/D40i is more than enough for me.







~*am i going to be as handsome as him holding the camera??
nobody know until i get the camera...so please fulfill my wish ya!!

I don't mind if i cant be as handsome as him with the camera..
but im sure i ll take a photo of you that as handsome as him!!hehe..
And for girl as pretty as her..





however if u're in tight budget.. a Nikon D40 (photo below) which is cheaper i also will accept it..hehe..
.

This is just one the item in the list.. Anyone who willing to fulfill it??

《Let's Eat Music品尝音乐会》

离开了我这秘密天地蛮一段日子了..是时间回来了..

大家一起倒数三秒我就有好料分享..

3.........................2..........................1......!!!!

海螺將舉辦超過20場免費音樂會俊傑壓軸登场

从10月31日起每逢周五和周六晚上，连续办历时1个半月的《Let's Eat Music品尝音乐会》。

由BY2打头阵， 林俊杰压轴登场。

从10月31日起， 每周五和周六晚上8时开始，地点有JayaOne海螺餐厅或JayaOne Palm Square户外场地。



*秋杏小姐， 我知道你是JJ的超级粉丝。。到时一起去ok??

update:有关新闻报道

UPDATE!!!

sorry for abandon my blog for a long time..
after all the chaos end then i ll back to blogsphere..
check out my post in a few days time..

Good Luck... Where Are You Friend??

Recently really no mood of everything!

Where is my luck??

Come back please, begging for you!!

华仔倒数916 live in Kelana Jaya 演唱会~

华仔倒数916 live in Kelana Jaya 演唱会~

~WahZhai 916 Countdown Live at Kelana Jaya~

~This WahZhai is not Andy Lau!

~He is our Homemade Superstar, Anwar(安华~华仔！)

~He will sing to an estimated 30,000 crowd of audience at Kelana Jaya Stadium tonite.

~The best thing about this special concert is it is FREE OF CHARGE!!

~What are you waiting for?

~Remember to be there early and grab the best seat to watch the concert that will change Malaysia for the 1st time in 51 years of nationhood!





The photo below is the real Wah Zhai..Andy Lau
Both Wah Zhai is the superstar in their own field.
One in entertainment another in the political!

::life is about finding the balance::

Cerita Kontroversi Berterusan : Wabak ISA!

Semalam satu negara terkejut tahap maksima dengan penularan wabak ISA.

Ia merebak dengan cepat sehingga tak dapat dikawal.

3 orang telah terkorban kebebasan mereka.

Satu negara berada di dalam satu keadaan berjaga-jaga.

Takut melihat TV takut terlihat muka Tuan Tua Mizan berucap dan mengistiharkan darurat.

Pada 1987 wabak ini pernah menyerang negara kitorang dan mengorbankan kebebasan 119 rakyat dan 3 surat khabar.

Ahli-ahli politik sememangnya tidak tidur malam tadi terutama pihak pembangkang yang takut turut dijangkiti wabak sama.

Adakah ia akan menyerang secara besar-besaran kali ini?
Siapakah penyebab penularan semua ini?
Dapatkah ia dikawal?
Apakah kesan wabak ini?
Kita tunggu dan lihat ya..

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Orang Tua ajal mendekat Tun M balik ke UMNO atas usaha kuat muhyiddin,
C4 kata peralihan kuasa serah kepada parti,
YB mampus melalak cina tumpang,
semua serang YB flip-flop,
Wabak kali ini bukan untuk menentang YB dicucuk,
ia untuk YB flip-flop.
C4 tak dapat tunggu lagi.
kalau-kalau YB Dicucuk berjaya dalam 916 maka dia tak dapat jadi PM,
kerja mesti dibuat untuk jadi pm,
wabak dilepaskan,
sama dengan bapa C4 yang merampas kuasa Tunku,
Bapa Borek Anak Rintik,
dengan nasihat Tun M, kerjasama dengan YB Mampus & Muhyiddin,
semua di tangan C4.

Satu plot dirancang.
Sama seperti 513 dan Op lalang.
Berjaga-jagalah jangan menjadi mangsa ISA.

Wahai Rakyat Malaysia, dengan ini saya menyeru janganlah anda menyertai apa-apa demonstrasi untuk mengelakkan sebarang provokasi!

Cerita Kontroversi lagi Panas : Siapa Bakal Mampus?

cerita dibawah adalah rekaan semata-mata, tidak berkaitan dengan yang hidup mahupun yang mati atau yang bakal mampus atau yang bakal jadi pm atau yang bakal digulingkan atau yang bakal digantung.. segala kebetulan adalah kebetulan semata-mata.. dan ia memang kebetulan jangan sekali-kali anda menyangkalnya..



Di satu malam(23/8/2XX8) yang hangat lagi panas, dikatakan seorang ahli politik yang bernama YB C4 telah menjalankan kempen politik di sekitar permatang pauh.

Di satu kampung yang dipenuhi dengan orang-orang melayu, terdengar seorang tengah berucap ketika ketibaan C4, dan C4 duduk sementara menunggu gilirannya untuk mengambil alih pentas tersebut.

Orang yang tengah berkempen dengan panasnya di atas pentas adalah tak lain tak bukan YB Mampus. Di tengah-tengah kebanjiran orang melayu di kawasan kempen tersebut, terdapat seorang pemberita Daratan Bintang iaitu Heroin Angin Jernih (Heroin) yang telah mengikut jejak C4 sepanjang kempen politik pada hari tersebut.

Di dalam liputannya, Heroin telah meneliti apa yang keluar dari mulut YB Mampus. Tiba-tiba, beliau terdengar ayat "Orang Penumpang Hanya Menumpang Di Sini", memang kontroversi! Beliau pandang ke pemberita lain yang turut membuat liputan, setiap orang terpaku mendengar ayat tersebut. Heroin terus mendengar ayat-ayat seterusnya mengharapkan satu penjelasan. Bukan penjelasan yang dikehendakinya, YB Mampus seturusnya menyatakan yang orang cina tak sanggup berkongsi kekayaan yang dimiliki.
Ini memang berita sensasi, hangat dan meletup lagi besar dari bom atom!

Keesokan harinya, Heroin pulang ke pejabatnya dan menulis satu laporan untuk dimuatkan di dalam akhbar Dataran Bintang keesokkan harinya(25/8/2XX8). Berita itu amatlah kecil, hanya 144perkataan dan 1.89% dari 1 mukasurat surat khabar itu. Berita tersbut taklah hangat sangat pada masa tersebut kerana semua orang menumpukan mata ke arah ibu pilihan raya kecil antara YB Dicucuk dan Pak Gemuk yang berlangsung pada 26/8/2XX8.

Akan tetapi, isu ini telah dipanaskan oleh orang-orang yang menumpang(Penumpang) seperti yang dikatakan oleh YB Mampus setelah YB Dicucuk menang pilihanraya tersebut. Parti-parti politik yang berasaskan kaum Penumpang terutama sayap pemuda telah membuat laporan polis yang menyatakan YB Mampus telah membuat kenyataan yang bersifat hasutan.

Pada masa yang sama, polis tidak dapat mencari YB Mampus untuk mengambil keterangan. Rasanya menyorot. Akan tetapi di atas usaha dan kerajinan polis, YB Mampus dapat dikesan beberapa hari kemudian dan keterangannya diambil.

Di masa kehilangan YB Mampus, satu situasi telah berlaku, YB C4 telah meminta maaf kepada masyarakat Penumpang di atas ucapan berunsur hasutan oleh YB Mampus. Tak tahu apa niat di sebalik minta maaf tersebut. Sudah tentu ada udang di sebalik batu.
Pada masa tersebut juga, PM tercinta YB Flip-flop telah menyatakan akan meminta YB Mampus meminta maaf dan memberikan kenyataan mengenai isu tersebut secepat mungkin.

10 hari selepas tercetusnya isu tersebut, YB Mampus bersama geng-geng Mampusnya seramai 13 orang telah membuat satu sidang akhbar untuk menjelaskan isu yang panas lagi kontroversial ini.

Di dalam sidang akhbar tersebut, semua wartawan yang hadir mengharapkan satu penjelasan dan wartawan Penumpang mengharapkan lebih iaitu satu minta maaf daripadanya. Akan tetapi, apa yang diharapkan tidak diperolehi, tetapi satu tuduhan ke atas Heroin telah dilemparkan oleh YB Mampus. YB Mampus menyatakan Heroin mempunyai agenda tersendiri dan membuat laporan berita palsu yang tersasar dari apa yang diucapnya dalam kempen pilihanraya.

Kesian Heroin yang berpengalaman dalam membuat liputan mengenai politik dilemparkan tuduhan sedemikian. Di dalam penjelasannya, YB Mampus menyatakan yang dia menyatakan Penumpang menumpang pada zaman sebelum kemerdekaan dan Heroin telah membuat laporan berasaskan sebahagian daripada ucapannya sahaja. YB Mampus enggan meminta maaf dan ini disokong oleh geng-geng Mampusnya. Penjelasan ini diterima oleh YB Flip-flop tetapi tiada kenyataan dari YB C4.

Parti-parti politik Penumpang tidak dapat menerima penjelasan yang diberikan oleh YB Mampus dan meminta YB Flip-flop mengambil tindakan ke atas si mulut celupar tersebut. Salah satu pemimpin Parti Penumpang iaitu Kepala Parti Ada-tolak-ada-gerak YB Kena-Koyak telah menyatakan akan keluar dari pakatan jika YB Mampus enggan meminta maaf.

Beberapa hari kemudian, YB Mampus and the gang mengadakan satu lagi sidang akhbar yang panas tahap matahari di mana dia menyatakan kaum Penumpang seperti Kaum Yahudi di US yang menguasai ekonomi dan memanupulasikan kuasa ekonominya ke atas politik negara. Acara kemuncak di sidang akhbar tersebut adalah pertunjukan koyak mengoyak. Salah seorang ahli geng Mampus telah mengambil gambar YB Kena Koyak dan mengoyaknya di hadapan media. YB Mampus turut meminta agar Parti Ada-tolak-ada-gerak dibuang daripada Pakatan 51-tahun.

Aksi-aksi geng mampus telah menimbulkan lagi kemarahan kaum Penumpang. Keesokan harinya, Pakatan 51-tahun telah bermesyuarat untuk menyelesaikan isu ini dari berlarutan. Ketua-ketua parti komponen telah menyerahkan kuasa untuk mengambil tindakan kepada YB Flip-flop dan YB Flip-flop berjanji tindakan tegas akan diambil ke atas YB Mampus setelah dia berunding dengan majlis tertinggi.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anda ingat cerita telah berakhir. Mungkin dengan apa yang berlaku sehingga hari blog ini ditulis.

Siapalah YB Mampus yang berani hingga tahap kritikal menghasut dengan isu perkauman dengan menyatakan Penumpang hanya menumpang?
Sebenarnya terdapat seseorang di belakang isu yang hangat masa kini. Siapakah yang sanggup menggunakan isu perkauman untuk mencapai impiannya. Adakah YB Dicucuk? YB C4? YB Flip-Flop? YB Kena-Koyak?

Di dalam isu ini, YB kena koyak sememangnya mempunyai agendanya tersendiri tetapi dia bukanlah dalang di sebalik semua yang berlaku. Dia adalah seorang cerdik pandai yang telah menggunakan peluang ini untuk mendapatkan populariti yang kian menjunam setelah kalah di pilihan raya umum. Ini adalah peluangnya menunjukkan yang dia sebenarnya berprihatin kepada kaum penumpang.

Dalang di sebalik semua ini di dalam cerita rekaan saya ini adalah YB C4. Seperti mana yang diumumkan YB Flip-flor hanya akan menyerahkan jawatannya kepada YB C4 pada 2010 dimana masih ada 2 tahun sebelum YB C4 boleh menjawat jawatan Kepala Negara. Oleh itu, isu ini telah dibangkitkan oleh YB C4 untuk mencetuskan satu situasi tegang di dalam negara di mana YB Flip-flop tidak dapat menangani dan terpaksa meletakkan jawatan dan akan diganti oleh YB C4.

Tidakkah anda berasa pelik dengan mudahnya YB C4 meminta maaf kepada kaum Penumpang di awal isu ini. Ini adalah untuk menunjukkan yang dia berada di pihak penumpang dan menjaga hati penumpang. Yang pasti, YB C4 tidak dapat tunggu 2 tahun lagi untuk mendapatkan jawatan tersebut. Di samping itu, jika dikaji sejarah keluarga C4, tidak sukar untuk kita mengenai pasti kesukaan keluarga C4 untuk bermain isu perkauman.

Satu lagi penjelasan kepada konspirasi rampasan kuasa adalah kuasa YB C4 keatas C4-C4 yang lain dan pasukan-pasukan tentera negaranya. Jika negara berada di dalam situasi tegang, Tuan Tua pasti akan mengistiharkan darurat dan kuasa pemerintahan akan diberikan kepada pihak tentera. Satu kerajaan tentera sementara akan ditubuhkan dan pasti YB C4 akan mengetuainya.

YB mampus di dalam cerita ini hanyalah satu watak kecil sahaja jika anda masih tidak tahu. Dia hanyalah satu prop YB C4 di dalam rancangan besarnya untuk merampas kuasa YB Flip-flop.

Sehingga Berjumpa lagi, sekian sahaja cerita sampai sini.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update-
dia memang tak boleh tahan dah
nanti update lagi
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/89590
http://merdekareview.com/news.php?n=7654
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/89594
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/89566

Operasi Lalang2 juga angkara dia?? nanti saya cerita lagi ya..

Who is Racist now??

Homeless Chinese (or Countryless Chinese according to Mummy Phoenie)

Ahmad Ismail! Who the fuck you think you are?

Such an irresponsible ADUN!

SinChew was published what you said on the night.

Now you push the responsible to the reporter! wtf!

People would not write if you never said it!

Wait until someone comes out with the video of the night(by super-duper cameraman Loh Gwo Bourne No. 2! hehe) and let the world judge you!

The strange thing is Najib is on the rally that night.

And he apologized on what you said on the night.

Is that mean something wrong with Najib's ears?

Need to go to Mongolia for treatment?

Or Altantuya had do something on him on that night that caused him wrongly listen to your seditious speech? (She closed his ear? I just know that Ghost close human eye鬼遮眼嘛）

If you didn't say something that create anger around the Chinese Community the why your beloved DPM-cum-UMNO vice president apologized on your seditious statement?

"Cina Hanya Tumpang Di Sini" - Remember the words that came out from your mouth?

You said we are not willing to share the wealth we have/gained?

For the past 51 years where do you think the government ge the money to "menongkatkan" orang Melayu (or just UMNO's cronies)?
-What "tongkat"? of caused the infamous NEP

We pay taxes too.

Do you think the the money to run NEP comes from sky?

And most of the taxes revenue especially the early part of formation of our country come from the Towkays whose are Chinese..wtf!

What do you feel if people say that you are squatter in your own home?

For the past 51 years Malaysian Chinese had treated Malaysia as the only home and you said that we are just "tumpang" here?

Where the Fuck do you think our home are?

P/S: You should take a lesson of nationality/domicile! wtf!


I hope this post won't offence any Malay as it touched the sensitive policy of our government which gives more rights to Malay. I have no problem with those rights but PLEASE don't ever try to touch Malaysian Chinese tiny little right as Malaysian

One Country, One Nationality -- Malaysian!

update: there are so many questions in this issue, will update bout my views when i'm free.
a little bit reveal-conspiracy between Najib and Ahmad in order to takeover UMNO.
He cannot til 2010 already.

FAMA 農夫 - 舉高隻手

listen to the lyric..
catch the words..
really help in life..

舉高只手

作曲：DJ Tommy
填詞：農夫
編曲：DJ Tommy/咖啡因公園
監製：DJ Tommy

我 我要 我要你
我 我要 我要你

舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜

細細個有人教你有個美德 無論你有幾得 千祈咪講出嚟
最緊要謙卑 隻手咪舉起
所以你碰到愛嘅人 你冇問 你冇試下伸隻手去拖下佢
你細個發嘅夢 當發夢 你冇膽豁出去捉緊佢

晚晚話鬱鬱不得志 睇死自己乜都失意
條路斜條路窄能走過只有Kenny B

所以你翻緊嗰份工唔係你嘅興趣
身邊嗰個人唔係你最愛嘅伴侶
生到成竇仔女 先至識得後悔 午夜望回流下兩滴淚水
點解唔伸出去 我辦不到
點解唔舉高佢 從今以後的起心肝抬起頭仲有

舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜

你咪再顧慮咁多 邊位睇小過我
隻手舉高過 駛乜驚舉錯

有冇諗過白日夢都可以成真
有冇諗過鍾意嘅人等緊你成親
有冇諗過呢世係你最開心嘅人生
睇你敢唔敢 舉高隻手唔好再等
用呢隻手拎住結婚戒指 問你鍾意嘅女士 佢願唔願意
用呢隻手其中一隻手指 對住你嘅波士 叫佢咪咁多事
用呢隻手改變世界歷史 有人話你無知 起碼你肯嘗試
我要用呢隻手寫出我嘅歌詞 無論你鍾唔鍾意

一齊嚟伸出去 讓他知道
一齊嚟舉高佢 從今以後舉高隻手你哋唔駛怕醜

舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜

我兩個 繼續唱歌
邊位醜得過我
隻手舉高過 駛乜驚舉錯
全人類舉高手好嗎
全人類舉高手好嗎

全人類舉高手好嗎 (舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜)
全人類舉高手好嗎 (舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜)
全人類舉高手好嗎 (舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜)
全人類舉高手好嗎 (舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜
舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜 舉高隻手 駛乜怕醜)

36 facts about the Olympic medal count

36 facts about the Olympic medal count

By Chris Chase

In honor of the 36 gold medals won by the United States at the 2008 Summer Olympics, Fourth-Place Medal presents 36 interesting facts about the overall medal count:

1) China won the most gold medals at the Beijing Games with 51. They become the first country to crack the 50-gold mark since the Soviet Union in 1988. The most golds ever won in a single Olympics is 83 (United States, 1984).

2) It's the first time since 1936 that a country other than the United States or the Soviet Union has led the medal count.

3) China won more golds in Beijing (51) than they did total medals in Atlanta (50).

4) 'Project 119' was a Chinese initiative designed toward winning golds in the medal-rich sports of swimming, track, rowing, kayaking and sailing. Reports are already crediting Project 119 with China's dominance in the gold medal count, but Chinese athletes won just four golds in those sports. Their total was instead augmented by even better performances in Chinese-dominated events like diving, gymnastics and table tennis.

5) The United States won the same amount of golds (36) that they did in Athens, continuing a remarkable consistency that the nation has exhibited over the past half-century. American Olympic gold totals since 1952: 40, 32, 34, 36, 45, 33, 34, 83, 36, 37, 44, 38, 36 and 36. (The outlier of 83 was from the boycotted 1984 Los Angeles Olympics.)

6) The overall medal count was won by the United States for the fourth consecutive Olympics. The U.S. earned 110 medals, compared to China's 100.

7) Per capita, China won one gold medal for every 25 million people in the country. The United States' per capita rate was one gold for every 8.5 million. The tiny island nation of Jamaica, which won a staggering six golds in Beijing, had a per capita rate of one gold for every 450,000 residents. Had China won at that rate, the country would have earned 2,889 golds.

8) Greece won 16 medals as the host country in 2004. Four years later, the founders of the Olympics managed just four -- their lowest total since 1992.

9) African countries won a total of 40 medals, the highest total in history for the continent.

10) Six countries won their first ever Olympic medals: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Mauritius, Sudan, Tajikistan and Togo.

11) Great Britain won 47 medals, the most in their history and a 17-medal increase from Athens. Expect an even higher total in 2012, when the Games will be held in London for the first time in 68 years. The last time Great Britain competed in a Summer Olympics on its home turf, they earned a disappointing three golds.

12) India has 17% of the world's population. They won 0.31% of Olympic medals.

13) China: 19.8% of population, 10.4% of medals.

14) United States: 4.6% of population, 11.5% medals.

15) Jamaica: 0.041% of population, 1.15% medals.

16) Iceland was the least populous country to win an Olympic medal.

17) Pakistan was the most populous country not to win an Olympic medal (164 million residents, sixth-largest nation in the world).

18) Michael Phelps would have finished tied for 9th in the gold medal count, ahead of countries including France, Netherlands, Spain, Canada, Argentina, Switzerland, Brazil and Mexico.

19) The rest of the world won seven golds in men's swimming events. Phelps, of course, won eight.

20) The United States won the most golds (7) and most total medals in the track competition (23), despite having what was widely considered a disappointing meet

21) More proof that boxing is dead in the United States: the country earned just one medal (a bronze) in the 12 boxing events. Even after three straight disappointing boxing performances at the Summer Games, the U.S. has still won the most Olympic boxing medals (109) in history.

22) China won 8 out of 12 possible medals in table tennis and 7 of 8 possible golds in diving.

23) Great Britain won 7 of 10 golds in track cycling and won 12 medals overall. The rest of the world earned 18 medals in the sport.

24) National gold-medal sweeps: Basketball (USA), Beach Volleyball (USA), Rhythmic Gymnastics (RUS), Synchronized Swimming (RUS), Table Tennis (CHN) and Trampoline (CHN).

25) Sweden had the best medal tally (4 silver, 1 bronze) without winning a gold.

26) Armenia won 6 bronze medals, but no gold or silver ones.

27) Speaking of former Soviet states, members of the former Soviet Union won a total of 173 medals in Beijing.

28) In 1992, Cuba finished 5th in the gold medal count. In 2008, the nation finished 28th.

29) From 1980 to 2008, Jamaica won three Olympic golds. In a span of six days in Beijing, Usain Bolt won three.

30) Sweden was a fixture in the top-three of the overall medal count for the early part of the 20th century. In Beijing, the Scandinavian country finished 38th and was shut-out in golds for just the second time in history.

31) Panama and Mongolia won the first gold medals in their respective histories.

32) China won 27 gold medals in judged sports.

33) The United States won 4 gold medals in judged sports.

34) China's "real" medal tally was 24/17/14/55.

35) The "real" medal tally for the United States: 32/31/27/80.

36) In all, 958 medals were handed out to athletes from 87 countries, the most medals and medal receipients in Olympic history.

http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/beijing/blog/fourth_place_medal/post/36-facts-about-the-Olympic-medal-count?urn=oly,103037

The Day With A Lot Of Controversial

Many ppl knw that i attending the Sultan Azlan Shah Public Lecturer which given by Tony Blair the former Prime Minister of Britain.
There are many statements on banning him from giving the lecture on rule of law especially after statement by Mahathir.
Don care so much bout that and here are some photos on the day..
not my problem anyway..hehe


Tony Blair seat on that day


Playing around with Ingle


Chor Soon

We Want An Independant Judiciary

Articles taken from www.malaysiakini.com

Revisiting the '88 judiciary crisis

Soon Li Tsin | Aug 12, 08 2:59pm

Two decades have passed since the 1988 judiciary crisis. But the effects still linger. MCPX The phrase 'judiciary crisis of 1988' is generally understood as relating to the suspension and sacking of Supreme Court judges including the then Lord President Salleh Abas. The crisis in fact went beyond that to include a besieged constitution and the erosion of the important principle governing democracies - the separation of powers. In a special report, Malaysiakini revisits the events that led to the day the judges were removed and along with them, the confidence in the independence of the judiciary. Since independence in 1957, the Malaysian judiciary was always held in high esteem throughout the Commonwealth for being reputably independent and impartial. The attacks on the judiciary began in 1986 when the Supreme Court decided in the 'Berthelsen case' that the immigration director-general was wrong to revoke the work permit of Asian Wall Street Journal correspondent John Bethelson because he was not given a chance to explain himself when the decision was made. Then prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad subsequently expressed concerns that the judiciary might not be interpreting the law as how Parliament and the Executive intended it to. He also moved amendments to the Police Act and the Printing Presses and Publications Act where scathing attacks were made against the judiciary. However, the most contentious amendment to the law was when Article 121(1) of the federal constitution - originally vesting the judicial power in the courts - was replaced by "jurisdiction and powers as may be conferred by or under federal law." This effectively removed the independence of the judiciary and subjected the courts to be subservient to federal law made by Parliament. The 'Umno 11' case Meanwhile in the courts, more cases which showed judges were capable of departing from government policies arose but none was more controversial than the 'Umno 11 case'. In the 1987 Umno party elections, Mahathir won by a very slim majority of 43 votes against Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah for the party presidency in 1987. Eleven Umno members then challenged the validity of this election, which resulted in then High Court judge Harun Hashim declaring that Umno was an unlawful society. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court and Salleh had fixed the hearing on June 13, 1988 by a full bench of nine Supreme Court judges. It was apparent that the political survival of Umno and Mahathir was at stake and many people interpreted this as the reason for the judicial crisis that was to follow. In light of the judiciary losing its judicial powers and Mahathir’s outbursts against judges in Parliament, Salleh met with 20 other judges and wrote a letter to the King and the state rulers on March 26, 1988 expressing hope that "the baseless remarks (against the judiciary) will cease." On May 27, 1988, Salleh was summoned to Mahathir’s office and was told that the King - Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj of Johor - wished him to retire as Lord President because of the said letter. He also received his letter of suspension that was backdated to May 26. The following day, Salleh sent a letter of resignation but withdrew it and held a press conference. On June 9, 1988 the prime minister told the King that Salleh committed further misconduct for using the press to demand for a public hearing of the tribunal made up of high judicial officers. A tribunal to try Salleh was quickly set up and the dates to hear the ‘Umno 11' appeal was vacated upon his suspension at the instructions of acting Lord President Hamid Omar. Six tribunal members were appointed pursuant to the federal constitution by the King on June 11. They were acting Lord President and chairperson Abdul Hamid Omar, former Federal Court judge Abdul Aziz Mohamed Zain, Dewan Rakyat speaker Mohamed Zahir Ismail, Singapore Supreme Court judge TS Sinnathuray, Sri Lankan Chief Justice KAP Ranasinghe and Chief Justice of Borneo Lee Hun Hoe. The list of charges against Salleh include making critical statements against the government on several occasions, falsely claiming that the letter written to the King was on behalf of the judges and giving untrue information to the media that discredited the government. The tribunal commenced its hearing on June 29 and Salleh was absent throughout but his counsels led by Raja Aziz Addruse were present. Meanwhile, the tribunal was assisted by then attorney-general Abu Talib Othman who submitted there was enough evidence to recommend Salleh's removal from office. Salleh through his counsel Raja Aziz (right), who was the Bar Council president then, had applied for an interim stay against the tribunal but High Court judge Ajaib Singh refused it. Raja Aziz went to see Wan Suleiman Pawanteh, the most senior judge at that time about this matter and the latter convened a special sitting of the Supreme Court on Saturday, July 2 1988. Raja Aziz had argued that the tribunal members were unconstitutional and invalid and the five Supreme Court judges - Wan Suleiman, George Seah, Eusoffe Abdoolcader, Mohd Azmi Kamaruddin and Wan Hamzah Mohamed Salleh - unanimously granted the ex parte order. Salleh wanted to challenge the constitution of the tribunal members and needed the order to halt the tribunal proceedings from carrying on in Parliament. Several incidents including the then chief registrar Haidar Mohd Noor hiding the court seal and locking the court doors as well as the Parliament gates being locked led to criticisms that there was a ploy to prevent anything from disrupting the tribunal. The final blow Two days after the order was given, the five judges were suspended from their duties without a reason. With six Supreme Court judges suspended, it effectively suspended the Supreme Court which meant the challenge toward the legality of the tribunal could not be heard. The tribunal finished its report on July 7, 1988. It recommended that Salleh be removed from office on the grounds of his misbehaviour which indicated his inability to discharge his duties and function as Lord President properly. Based on this, Salleh was removed as Lord President on Aug 8, 1988 by the King based on the recommendation of the tribunal. Hamid became Lord President soon after. It is also interesting to note that the ‘Umno 11' appeal was heard the same day and dismissed the following day. Salleh’s dismissal led the Bar Council to pass a resolution in an extraordinary general meeting refusing to recognise Hamid as the new Lord President. Meanwhile, a second tribunal chaired by judge Edgar Joseph Jr - the 13th most senior judge out of 28 High Court judges - was set up to look into the conduct of the five suspended Supreme Court judges. The last blow to the judiciary was dealt by Edgar who found Wan Suleiman and George Seah guilty of misconduct and the King on Oct 4, 1988 ordered for their dismissal. The other three - Eusoffe, Azmi and Wan Hamzah were reinstated but the judiciary was never the same again. With the Supreme Court incapacitated and the amended constitution limiting the judiciary’s powers to only as much that Parliament might grant it - this period became known as the ‘blackest days’ in Malaysia’s history.

'88 crisis: The Bar strikes back

Soon Li Tsin | Aug 13, 08 12:08pm

It was troubling times for the Malaysian Bar back in 1988. MCPX On March 19 that year, lawyer Param Cumaraswamy in his final speech as Bar Council chairperson had set the mood of the turbulent time that was to dawn on the legal fraternity. "Today, I step down with a sense of sadness. Not because I am relinquishing the president’s post. But because of the deteriorating state of the fundamental liberties in this country. "Just on the eve of my retirement from the presidency, we saw one of the basic structures of our Constitution destroyed. "The balance between the Executive, the Legislative at the centre gains enormously in power at the expense of the judiciary," he said. The speech was made in light of a slew of attacks by then premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad against the judiciary and judges as well as when Article 121 of the Federal Constitution - which guarantees judicial independence - was amended. Mahathir taken to task In his hard-hitting speech, Param had levelled criticisms against Mahathir for being ignorant to what the judiciary stood for. "The prime minister’s vile and contemptuous allegations and accusations leveled at the judiciary and our judges left many shocked beyond belief. "His speech (in Parliament), which was full of venom, hate and spite with no substance whatsoever, illustrated his complete and total ignorance of the role of the judiciary and the judicial process itself. "What he may not have realised is that in directing all those attacks on our judges, he has in fact, thrown his might not so much against His Majesty’s judges, but against the majesty of Law, Justice and the Constitution. "Far from clearly defining the duties and functions of each arm of the government, he has caused confusion. He had indeed defaced and defiled the Constitution," Param said. The former United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers then gave assurance that the Bar would continue to campaign for judicial independence again. "Here let me assure our judges that the Bar pledges its complete and total support to them and will see that the judicial power remains with their courts. "These amendments will not go without a challenge. I am sure when the time comes, our judges will rise to the occasion and assert what is rightly their Constitutional power and restore the supremacy of our Constitution. "The Constitution does not belong to the prime minister or his government. It belongs to the people. It is the agreed charter of the nation. "A responsible government will organise itself to meet with the requirements of the Constitution and not amend the Constitution to suit the needs of the government," he said to hundreds of guests present. Param handed the reigns over to prominent lawyer Raja Aziz Addruse who subsequently became lead counsel for sacked Lord President Salleh Abas. Meeting with Hamid Param, who met with Malaysiakini recently, recollected the events that took place soon after his speech. He also related how he met the judge who succeeded Salleh as head of the judiciary, Hamid Omar then. According to Param, the Bar had directed him to see Hamid after receiving information that the senior judge - who was next in line to be Lord President - would chair the controversial tribunal that decided Salleh's (photo) fate. "I said to him, ‘We are concerned that if you are appointed and you chair the tribunal it will not look good for our judiciary because you are the next in line for the office of the Lord President and you are party to the letter (about) the meeting which agreed to Salleh writing a letter to the king". There will be a conflict of interest," he related. However, Param was shocked when Hamid admitted that he was worried about being sacked if he did not take up the position of chairperson in the tribunal. "He said something that was most shocking. He said, 'If I don’t accept the appointment, I will be sacked. If I’m sacked, will you or the Bar Council compensate the loss of my remuneration?' "I said, 'I am most surprised that such remarks are coming from you as chief justice. You and I know that the King is a constitutional monarch and he acts on advice. How can you say he will sack you?' "He said, 'Oh you don’t know him. If you want, you go and tell him. I will buy you dinner'. That’s all he said," he related. He noted how current Home Minister, Syed Hamid Albar, was present at the extraordinary general meeting held by the Bar then. "He was a member of the Bar in 1988 when we took the resolutions to boycott Hamid Omar (the one who replaced Salleh as Lord President) in an EGM with the highest turnout ever that time. "Syed Hamid was present. He had both his hands up, people noticed that. And I think he should be reminded of the great support he gave to the Malaysian Bar when we took that position against Mahathir’s attack on the judiciary and Hamid’s involvement in the tribunal," he said.

more articles to follow..

2nd year junior.. read this and will help your study in Constitutional Law paper..

You Have Been Warned!! A Big Bunch of Photo Ahead!

Proud to be Chinese although not from China.

One World One Dream